Do GPU cloud prices change?
Yes — and often. In the window 2026-11-05 → 2026-11-06, re-observing the same machines showed 967 of 1,049 devices changed price, 2,192 repricing events (1,095 up / 1,097 down), median magnitude 6.1%, P90 22.8%, with 79% changing within the same day.
Source: repeated observations of device-level public listings on vast.ai / Clore.ai (same CVIN, consecutive observations) · synthetic seeds excluded · window 2026-11-05 → 2026-11-06 · as of 2026-11-06
Volatility at a glance
| 指标 | 值 | 含义 |
|---|---|---|
| Devices with repeat observations | 1,049 | machines seen at least twice under the same CVIN |
| Of which repriced | 967(92%) | price moved more than 0.5% between consecutive observations |
| Repricing events | 2,192 | one event per change on one machine |
| Up / down | 1,095 / 1,097 | 50% are increases — not a one-way decline |
| Median / P90 magnitude | 6.1% / 22.8% | absolute values, direction ignored |
| Intraday share | 79% | changed within the same calendar day — far faster than a few-day cadence |
The only question this section answers: is yesterday's bill still valid? It does not answer "who is cutting prices" — see section 3 for why.
Volatility by model (≥ 15 events)
| Model | Events | Up / down | Median | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA V100 nv.v100.32g | 507 | 458 / 49 | 13.8% | 36% |
| NVIDIA RTX5070TI nv.rtx5070ti.16g | 197 | 73 / 124 | 2.6% | 139% |
| NVIDIA RTX5060 nv.rtx5060.8g | 145 | 24 / 121 | 2.2% | 22% |
| NVIDIA RTX3090 nv.rtx3090.24g | 114 | 41 / 73 | 10.0% | 87% |
| NVIDIA RTX4090 nv.rtx4090.24g | 111 | 60 / 51 | 6.0% | 154% |
| NVIDIA RTX5090 nv.rtx5090.32g | 91 | 33 / 58 | 7.8% | 58% |
| NVIDIA RTX5070 nv.rtx5070.12g | 88 | 28 / 60 | 3.7% | 50% |
| NVIDIA RTX5060TI nv.rtx5060ti.16g | 84 | 38 / 46 | 4.5% | 33% |
| NVIDIA RTX3070 nv.rtx3070.8g | 84 | 43 / 41 | 2.2% | 38% |
| NVIDIA RTX5080 nv.rtx5080.16g | 66 | 37 / 29 | 6.0% | 858% |
| NVIDIA RTX3060TI nv.rtx3060ti.8g | 57 | 22 / 35 | 33.3% | 131% |
| NVIDIA RTX4070 nv.rtx4070.12g | 50 | 21 / 29 | 1.9% | 41% |
| NVIDIA RTX3080 nv.rtx3080.10g | 46 | 21 / 25 | 8.4% | 22% |
| NVIDIA RTX4070TISUPER nv.rtx4070tisuper.16g | 46 | 19 / 27 | 1.8% | 33% |
| NVIDIA H200NVL nv.h200nvl.140g | 44 | 7 / 37 | 6.6% | 31% |
| NVIDIA RTX5090DV2 nv.rtx5090dv2.24g | 32 | 18 / 14 | 1.9% | 26% |
| NVIDIA RTX3060 nv.rtx3060.12g | 24 | 8 / 16 | 8.7% | 100% |
| NVIDIA RTX4070TI nv.rtx4070ti.12g | 22 | 7 / 15 | 5.2% | 25% |
| NVIDIA CMP170HX nv.cmp170hx.64g | 17 | 5 / 12 | 8.3% | 23% |
| NVIDIA RTXPRO6000S nv.rtxpro6000s.96g | 16 | 10 / 6 | 2.5% | 170% |
| NVIDIA GTX1070 nv.gtx1070.8g | 16 | 0 / 16 | 3.1% | 7% |
Models with fewer than 15 events are omitted — with a tiny sample the magnitude column is the story of one or two machines.
The largest swings (and why they are not market data)
| Device | Platform | When | From → to | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26eebqifljq3lvg2 NVIDIA RTX5080 | clore.ai | 11-05 21:15 | $0.200 → $1.917 | +858% |
| g9bv92v723ucug7e NVIDIA RTX4080SUPER | clore.ai | 11-05 07:45 | $0.160 → $0.577 | +260% |
| 2vjlh7wi6igjs04k NVIDIA RTXPRO6000S | vast.ai | 11-05 07:00 | $1.977 → $5.339 | +170% |
| 264gugdxrqddb145 NVIDIA RTX4090 | clore.ai | 11-05 07:45 | $0.271 → $0.688 | +154% |
| 5k0te1d1riem2h1z NVIDIA RTX4090 | clore.ai | 11-05 07:45 | $0.271 → $0.688 | +154% |
| 1cbg9dqypd3e238f NVIDIA RTX5070TI | clore.ai | 11-05 10:00 | $0.174 → $0.417 | +139% |
These extremes are most likely source-side typos or unit errors, not market moves. A machine jumping from $0.20 to $1.92 (8.6x) in half an hour is not normal pricing. They are listed to make one point: the listing field itself is unreliable — which is exactly why repeated observation beats a one-shot snapshot. Any citation must carry its observation time, and no trend may be inferred from a single extreme.
How to use this
② Risk: Never value collateral at a single-point asking price. An asking price is neither a transaction price nor a commitment, and it moves — which is exactly why this registry re-observes the same machine.
③ Citing: Any price citation must carry its observation time and this page's volatility, or the number may be wrong within hours.
Three limits
② The window is only 2 days — not enough for trends. This page establishes that prices move, and how fast — not where they are heading.
③ Asking price ≠ transaction price. We never observe the transaction; every number here is what the provider posted.